Процес витворення  римської моделі титулатури

Nazar Biletsky

doi:10.30840/2413-7065.4(65).2017.127719

Автор(и)

Nazar Biletsky НДІУ, Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1300-9042

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.4(65).2017.127719

Ключові слова:

модель титулатури, Римська імперія, Візантійська імперія, верховні правителі, титулатурний атрибут, титулатурний абстракт

Анотація

У статті розглядається проблематика вивчення домодерної титулатури. Спираючись на аналіз уявлень про верховну владу та взаємодію правителя з елітами в Римській та Візантійській імперіях, автор пропонує основні елементи римської моделі титулатури, що стала взірцем для більшості середньовічних монархій.

Біографія автора

Nazar Biletsky, НДІУ

Назар Білецький

молодший науковий співробітник відділу історичних пам’яток НДІУ

Посилання

BILETSKY, N. (2016). The Factors of the European Titulature Semantics of the 17th Century. Ukrainoznavstvo (Ukrainian Studies), Vol. 2, pp. 52–71. [in Ukr.]

GUILLAND, R. (1969). Studies on the Administrative History of the Byzantine Empire. Vizantiyskiy vremennik (Byzantine Bulletin). Vol. 29. Saint Petersburg, pp. 88–94. [in Rus.]

GUILLAND, R. (1964). Sketches about the Administrative History of the Early Byzantine Empire. Vizantiyskiy vremennik (Byzantine Bulletin). Vol. 24. Saint Petersburg, pp. 35–48. [in Rus.]

GEERTZ, C. (2001). Interpretations of Cultures. Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 542 p. [in Ukr.]

KOZELLECK, R. (2006). Time Layers. A Study in Theory of History. Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 429 p. [in Ukr.]

KOPTEV, A. (1996). Princeps et Dominus: On the Notion of the Evolution of the Principate in the Beginning of the Late Antiquity. Drevnee pravo (Old Law), (1), pp. 182–190. [in Rus.]

KĂNEV, N. (2009). The Byzantine Hierarchical Model from the 9th Century to the 11th Century. Antichnaya drevnost i sredniye veka. (Ancient Antiquities and Middle Ages), Vol. 39. Yekaterinburg, pp. 142–163. [in Bul.]

STARCHENKO, N. (2014). Blood, Honor, Rhetoric. The Conflict in the Noble Environment. Kyiv: Laurus, 509 p. [in Ukr.]

YAKOVENKO, N. (2008). The Ukrainian Nobility since 14th to the Middle of the 17th Century. Kyiv: Krytyka, 472 p. [in Ukr.]

ANGELOV, A. (2014). In Search of God’s Only Emperor: Basileus in Byzantine and Modern Historiography. Journal of Medieval History, Vol. 40. (2) London, pp. 123–141. [in Eng.]

BĘTKOWSKI, M. (2014). The Image of the Byzantine-Frankish Relations in the Letters of the Merovingians to Justinian. Part 2: Titulature. Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Historyczne Kraków (Scientific Proceedings of Jagiellonian University. Historical Works). Vol. 141 (3). Krakow, pp. 599–617. [in Pol.]

BIAŁY, P. (2014). The Outset of the Functioning of the Title ‘Dominus noster’ in the Roman Imperial Mint. Wieki Stare i Nowe (Old and New Centuries, Vol. 6 (11), pp. 11–23. [in Pol.]

BISSON, Th. (2009). The Crisis of the Twelfth Century. Princeton, 640 p. [in Eng.]

BOROŃ, P. (2010). Dukes, Kings, Emperors. The Titles of the Slavic Rulers in the High Middle Ages. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 325 p. [in Pol.]

BROWN, P., LEVINSON, S. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 345 p. [in Eng.]

BROWN, R., GILMAN, A. (1960). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In: T. SEBEOK, ed., Style in Language. Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 253–276. [in Eng.]

BURKE, P. (1992). History and Social Theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 198 p. [in Eng.]

BURKE, P. (2004). Languages and Communities in Early–Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210 p. [in Eng.]

CHRYSOS, E. (1978). The Title ‘Basileus’ in Early Byzantine International Relations. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Vol. 32, pp. 29–75. [in Eng.]

DICKEY, E. (2002). Latin Forms of Address. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 428 p. [in Eng.]

DUMEZIL, G. (1998). Mitra–Varuna. New York: Zone Books, 189 p. [in Eng.]

ESPELO, D. van (2013). A Testimony of Carolingian Rule? The Codex epistolaris Carolinus, Its Historical Context, and the Meaning of Imperium. Early Medieval Europe, Vol. 21, pp. 254–282. [in Eng.]

FERGUSSON, Ch. (1959). Diglossia. Word, Vol. 15, pp. 325–340. [in Eng.]

HOFFMAN, K. (2009). Culture as a Text: Hazards and Possibilities of Geertz’s Literary/Literacy Metaphor. The Journal of North African Studies, Vol. 14 (3/4), pp. 417–430. [in Eng.]

HOSE, M. (1999). Post–Colonial Theory and Greek Literature in Rome. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 303–326. [in Eng.]

HUMPHRIES, M. (2003). Roman Senators and Absent Emperors in Late Antiquity. Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia, Vol. 17. pp. 27–46. [in Eng.]

WUENSCH, R., ed. (1903). John Ludys on the Magistrates of Roman People. Leipzig, 183 p. [in Gre.]

KELLY, Ch. (2004). Ruling the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 341 p. [in Eng.]

KEYES, C. (1917). The Constitutional Position of the Roman Dictatorship. Studies in Philology, Vol. 14 (4), pp. 298–305. [in Eng.]

KIEŁKIEWICZ–JANOWIAK, A. (1990). A Socio-Historical Study in Address: Polish and English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, 132 p. [in Eng.]

KOCH, P. (1903). Byzantine Official Titles from 400 to 700 AD. Jena, 127 p. [in Ger.]

LEVINSON, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 438 p. [in Eng.]

LINE, Ph. (2007). Kingship and State Formation in Sweden 1130–1290. Brill, 700 p. [in Eng.]

MAAS, M. (2005). John Lydus and the Roman Past. New York; London, 210 p. [in Eng.]

OSTROGORSKI, G. (1956). The Byzantine Emperor and the Hierarchical World Order. The Slavonic and East European Review, Vol. 35 (88), pp. 1–14. [in Eng.]

POTTER, D. (1994). Prophets and Emperors. Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. London, 281 p. [in Eng.]

RAFFENSPERGER, Ch. (2016). Kings or Princes? Why Do the Titles of Russian Rulers Matter? [online]. Available at: https://krytyka.com/en/articles/kings–or–princes–why–do–titles–rusian–rulers–matter. [Accessed 11 Nov. 2017] [in Eng.]

REUTER, T. (2006). Medieval Polities and Modern Mentalities. Cambridge, 436 p. [in Eng.]

CAMERON, A., WARD-PERKINS, B., WHITBY, M., eds. (2008). The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 14. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1121 p. [in Eng.]

KADAR, D., CULPEPPER, J., eds. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 295 p. [in Eng.]

VYKYPĚL, B. (2011). Studies on the Titles of the Nobility in Germanic, Slavic, and Baltic Languages. Prague, 322 p. [in Cze.]

WEISWEILLER, J. (2012). From Equality to Asymmetry: Honorific Statues, Imperial Power, and Senatorial Identity in Late Antique Rome. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Vol. 25, pp. 319–350. [in Eng.]

WEISWEILLER, J. (2015). The Roman Aristocracy between East and West Divine Monarchy, State–Building and the Transformation of the Roman Senatorial Order (c. 25 BCE – 425 CE). In: T. MINAMIKAWA, ed., New Approaches to the Later Roman Empire: Proceedings of a Conference Held at Kyoto University on 8 March 2014. Kyoto, pp. 31–52. [in Eng.]