Це застарівша версія, яка була опублікована 2024-06-29. Прочитайте найбільш нову версію.

Humanism of the Civilization Project of Ukraine: The Search for the Worldview and Methodological Basis of Productive Social Practices

Автор(и)

  • Nazip Khamitov Інститут філософії імені Г.С. Сковороди НАН України, Україна

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7065.1(90).2024.306303

Анотація

The article shows that each country, which is not an object but a subject of history and geopolitics, has its own civilizational project. It has been proven that the meaning and purpose of this project in a democratic, open society is the worthy self-realization of citizens in productive social practices, which gives rise to the civilizational subjectivity of the country.

Based on the methodological strategies of meta-anthropology and meta-anthropological potentialism, a humanistic civilisational project is understood as an image of the future of the country, generating a strategy of free, dignified, and effective implementation in the world thanks to the worthy self-realization of its citizens, in the process of which cultural identity is formed in combination with civilisational progress. A humanistic civilizational project is the result of a productive civilizational choice that makes a country a subject of history and its citizens protected, free, and not a threat to other countries.

It has been proven that the worthy self-realization of the individual in any era and among any people becomes the basis of civilizational projects and the development of civilization. However, only in the 21st century does it begin to be recognized as the main goal of civilizational projects, making these projects not only more humanistic but also more effective. A civilizational project in which man, his development, and self-realization are only a means will not be successful today under any circumstances. This should be taken into account when creating and implementing the Ukrainian civilizational project.

It is shown that in human life the cultural and civilizational principles are in constant interaction – culture is the spiritual content of civilization, and civilization creates conditions for the development of culture. Civilization takes on meaning as a means of revealing the socio-economic and cultural potential of a country, bringing it to the world level, and culture acts as a way of inspiration, worldview deepening and humanization of civilization. Therefore, the social practices of the civilizational project of Ukraine, which actualize its subjectivity, should be humanistic in conditions of both war and peace.

 

Посилання

HORBULIN, V. (2016). The Cun-ning Uncertainty of the New World Order. Mirror of the Week. No. 30, August 27. [in Ukr.]

KRYLOVA, S. (2011). Human Beauty: Personality, Family, Society (So-cial-Philosophical Analysis). Nizhyn: As-pect-Polygraph, 344 p. [in Ukr.]

PYROZHKOV, S., KHAMITOV, N. (2020). Civilizational Subjectivity of Ukraine: from Potentials to a New Worldview and Human Being. Kyiv: Nau-kova dumka, 250 p. [in Ukr.]

PYROZHKOV, S. (1991). The Image of a Person and the Labour Poten-tial of the Population. Philosophical and Sociological Thought. No. 7. P. 66–81. [in Ukr.]

PYROZHKOV S., KHAMITOV, N. (2016). Civilization Project of Ukraine: from Ambitions to Real Possibilities. Bul-letin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. No. 6, pp. 45–52. [in Ukr.]

PYROZHKOV, S., KHAMITOV, N. (2016). Civilizational Choice of Ukraine in the Globalized World. Mirror of the Week, No. 28, August 13, p. 4. [in Ukr.]

KHAMITOV, N. (2016). Philoso-phy: Existence, Man, Peace. From Meta-physics to Metaanthropology. 3rd ed., correct. and ext. Kyiv: KNT, 268 p. [in Rus.]

KHAMITOV, N. (2016). Philo-sophical Anthropology as Meta-anthropology: Meta-Theory of Humanitar-ian Sciences and Philosophy of Anthropo-transcendence. The Philosophy of Man as a Way of Humanism and Dignity in the Marginal Existence of Society: the Ap-proach of Philosophical Anthropology as Meta-Anthropology. Collection of Scien-tific Works. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, pp. 6–30. [in Ukr.]

KHAMITOV, N. (2022). Philo-sophical Anthropology: Current Problems. From Theoretical to Practical Turn. 5th ed., correct. and ext. Kyiv: KNT, 405 p. [in Ukr.]

BERDIAEV, N. (1947). Dialectique Existentielle du Divin et de L'-humain, Paris, Janin. 247 p. [in Fra.]

SCHELER, M. (1929). Philoso-phische Weltanschauung. Verlag von Friedrich Cohen in Bonn. pp. 3–14. [in Deu.]

KHAMITOV, N. (2023). The War in Ukraine and the New Humanism: David versus Goliath. Meta-Anthropology of History of the 21st Century. Sofia: KIBEA Publishing. 123 p. [in Eng.]

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

— Оновлено 2024-06-29

Версії

Номер

Розділ

Філософія та методологія українознавства